1. Intellectual quality, argument & originality — 25 points
Looks at insight, thesis or purpose, complexity of thought, and whether important claims are developed rather than simply asserted.
EssayHow is designed to help you understand a draft, identify revision priorities, and refine your writing. We show the scoring method and its limits so you can make your own academic decisions.
The Rate My Paper tool evaluates the submitted work on its own merits and uses the assignment prompt or rubric you provide when available. The score is the sum of five rubric categories:
Looks at insight, thesis or purpose, complexity of thought, and whether important claims are developed rather than simply asserted.
Looks at reasoning, interpretation, integration and evaluation of evidence, examples, research, or course material. Unsupported claims are not treated as strong evidence.
Looks at structure, paragraph development, logical progression, transitions, and whether the paper moves toward its purpose clearly.
Looks at precision, control of language, sentence variety, concision, and an appropriate academic voice.
Looks at grammar, syntax, punctuation, citation or presentation consistency where relevant, and readability.
Reserved for work that is genuinely distinguished rather than simply polished.
Sophisticated and consistently strong, with relatively limited weaknesses.
Strong work with meaningful limitations that can still affect the final result.
The draft may have useful strengths while remaining underdeveloped or insufficiently analytical in important places.
Important problems materially affect the quality of the submission.
Major issues limit the draft's effectiveness and should be addressed before submission.
If you provide the assignment question, instructions, or professor's rubric, EssayHow uses that context when evaluating the paper. Without it, the tool evaluates the document using the selected paper type and the paper's own purpose. This means the result is a structured review, not a guarantee of the grade a particular instructor will award.
EssayHow does not publish submitted essays or reports to a public repository, and we do not make them publicly searchable for other students to browse. Your saved workspace is associated with your account rather than being presented as a public database of student papers.
EssayHow processes submitted text to provide the service you request, such as rating or humanizing. For the exact details of account and data handling, see the Privacy Policy.
Credibility should come from evidence, not invented marketing numbers. We intend to use genuine student feedback, permission-based anonymized before-and-after examples, and—when a formal benchmark is conducted—comparison against independent human evaluators. Any future validation results should report the sample, review process, agreement, and disagreements rather than hiding limitations.
Start with your own draft, review the feedback, and decide which changes actually improve the work.
Rate My Paper